EXOSKELETONS IN NEUROLOGICAL REHABILITATION: A COMMENTARY ON CURRENT EVIDENCE AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Authors

  • LOW JIE EN Department of Biomedical Sciences, Sunway University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • NANCY CHOON-SI NG Department of Medical Education, Sunway University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • REBECCA SHIN-YEE WONG Department of Medical Education, Sunway University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55197/qjmhs.v4i3.147

Keywords:

exoskeleton-assisted rehabilitation, neurological disability, stroke and spinal cord injury, gait training and mobility, neuroplasticity and functional recovery

Abstract

Neurological disorders like stroke and spinal cord injury (SCI) are among the leading causes of long-term disability worldwide, causing severe physical, emotional, and economic burdens to patients, families, and healthcare systems. While conventional forms of rehabilitation like physical therapy are the foundation of restoration, they are often limited by resource constraints, variability in delivery, and inaccessibility problems. Robot exoskeletons have emerged as revolutionary technology in neurorehabilitation by allowing for high-intensity, repetitive and task-specific training that enables neuroplasticity and recovery of function. This commentary pertains to the increasing application of exoskeletons to promote mobility, autonomy, and quality of life in patients with stroke and SCI. Clinical trials suggest noteworthy gait speed, endurance, balance, strength, cardiovascular, and psychological resilience gains. But these challenges, such as high cost, heterogeneity of devices, short-term data constraints, and ethical challenges of equity and informed consent, must be overcome. Greater integration into public health systems could reduce disability burden, enhance access to rehabilitation, and enhance outcomes in a variety of populations. Future advances include the development of cost-effective, transportable models, customized therapy protocols, and large clinical trials to enable widespread clinical application. With strategic collaboration and continuous innovation, exoskeletons are set to leave a strong footprint on the neurological rehabilitation horizon of the future.

References

[1] Aach, M., Schildhauer, T.A., Zieriacks, A., Jansen, O., Weßling, M., Brinkemper, A., Grasmücke, D. (2023): Feasibility, safety, and functional outcomes using the neurological controlled Hybrid Assistive Limb exoskeleton (HAL®) following acute incomplete and complete spinal cord injury-Results of 50 patients. – The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 46(4): 574-581.

[2] Banyai, A.D., Brișan, C. (2024): Robotics in physical rehabilitation: Systematic Review. – In Healthcare 12(17): 17p.

[3] Calabrò, R.S., Sorrentino, G., Cassio, A., Mazzoli, D., Andrenelli, E., Bizzarini, E., Campanini, I., Carmignano, S.M., Cerulli, S., Chisari, C., Colombo, V. (2021): Robotic-assisted gait rehabilitation following stroke: a systematic review of current guidelines and practical clinical recommendations. – European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 57(3): 460-471.

[4] Chang, W.H., Kim, Y.H. (2013): Robot-assisted therapy in stroke rehabilitation. – Journal of Stroke 15(3): 8p.

[5] Charbonneau, R., Loyola-Sanchez, A., McIntosh, K., MacKean, G., Ho, C. (2022): Exoskeleton use in acute rehabilitation post spinal cord injury: A qualitative study exploring patients’ experiences. – The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 45(6): 848-856.

[6] Edwards, D.J., Forrest, G., Cortes, M., Weightman, M.M., Sadowsky, C., Chang, S.H., Furman, K., Bialek, A., Prokup, S., Carlow, J., VanHiel, L. (2022). Walking improvement in chronic incomplete spinal cord injury with exoskeleton robotic training (WISE): a randomized controlled trial. – Spinal Cord 60(6): 522-532.

[7] Estilow, T., Glanzman, A.M., Powers, K., Moll, A., Flickinger, J., Medne, L., Tennekoon, G., Yum, S.W. (2018): Use of the Wilmington robotic exoskeleton to improve upper extremity function in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. – The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 72(2): 7202345010p1-7202345010p5.

[8] Furlan, J.C., Furlan, D.T., Marquez-Chin, C. (2022): A Scoping Review of Registered Clinical Studies on Management of Individuals With Acute Spinal Cord Injury (2000–2020): Trends and Characteristics of the Research Initiatives. – American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 101(2): 184-190.

[9] Gil-Agudo, Á., Megía-García, Á., Pons, J.L., Sinovas-Alonso, I., Comino-Suárez, N., Lozano-Berrio, V., Del-Ama, A.J. (2023): Exoskeleton-based training improves walking independence in incomplete spinal cord injury patients: results from a randomized controlled trial. – Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 20(1): 11p.

[10] Gryfe, P., Sexton, A., McGibbon, C.A. (2022): Using gait robotics to improve symptoms of Parkinson’s disease: an open-label, pilot randomized controlled trial. – European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 58(5): 15p.

[11] Gupta, A., Prakash, N.B., Honavar, P.R. (2023): Gait training with robotic exoskeleton assisted rehabilitation system in patients with incomplete traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injury: A pilot study and review of literature. – Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology 26(Suppl 1): S26-S31.

[12] He, Y., Xu, Y., Hai, M., Feng, Y., Liu, P., Chen, Z., Duan, W. (2024): Exoskeleton-assisted rehabilitation and neuroplasticity in spinal cord injury. – World Neurosurgery 185: 45-54.

[13] Hsu, T.H., Tsai, C.L., Chi, J.Y., Hsu, C.Y., Lin, Y.N. (2023): Effect of wearable exoskeleton on post-stroke gait: A systematic review and meta-analysis. – Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 66(1): 8p.

[14] Lee, M.H., Tian, M.Y., Kim, M.K. (2024): The Effectiveness of Overground Robot Exoskeleton Gait Training on Gait Outcomes, Balance, and Motor Function in Patients with Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. – Brain Sciences 14(8): 23p.

[15] Nepomuceno, P., Souza, W.H., Pakosh, M., Musselman, K.E., Craven, B.C. (2024): Exoskeleton-based exercises for overground gait and balance rehabilitation in spinal cord injury: A systematic review of dose and dosage parameters. – Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 21(1): 21p.

[16] Nolan, K.J., Karunakaran, K.K., Ehrenberg, N., Kesten, A.G. (2018): Robotic exoskeleton gait training for inpatient rehabilitation in a young adult with traumatic brain injury. – In 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), IEEE 3p.

[17] Ramli, N.N.N., Asokan, A., Mayakrishnan, D., Annamalai, H. (2021): Exploring stroke rehabilitation in Malaysia: are robots better than humans for stroke recuperation? – The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences: MJMS 28(4): 10p.

[18] Singh, N., Saini, M., Kumar, N., Srivastava, M.P., Mehndiratta, A. (2021): Evidence of neuroplasticity with robotic hand exoskeleton for post-stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. – Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 18(1): 15p.

[19] Ullah, S., Khalid, S.Y., Iftikhar, S.M.S. (2023): Frequency and causes of traumatic and non-traumatic spinal injury reported at two major tertiary care hospitals of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. – Cureus 15(1): 6p.

[20] Van Dijsseldonk, R.B., van Nes, I.J., Geurts, A.C., Keijsers, N.L. (2020): Exoskeleton home and community use in people with complete spinal cord injury. – Scientific Reports 10(1): 8p.

[21] Van Dijsseldonk, R.B., Vriezekolk, J.E., Keijsers, N.L., Geurts, A.C., Van Nes, I.J. (2023): Needs and wishes for the future lower limb exoskeleton: an interview study among people with spinal cord injury with community-based exoskeleton experience. – Disability and Rehabilitation 45(7): 1139-1146.

[22] Van Nes, I.J., Van Dijsseldonk, R.B., van Herpen, F.H., Rijken, H., Geurts, A.C., Keijsers, N.L. (2024): Improvement of quality of life after 2-month exoskeleton training in patients with chronic spinal cord injury. – The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 47(3): 354-360.

[23] Wen, S., Huang, R., Liu, L., Zheng, Y., Yu, H. (2024): Robotic exoskeleton-assisted walking rehabilitation for stroke patients: a bibliometric and visual analysis. – Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 12: 15p.

[24] Wolff, J., Parker, C., Borisoff, J., Mortenson, W.B., Mattie, J. (2014): A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology. – Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 11: 1-10.

[25] Zhang, Y., Zhao, W., Wan, C., Wu, X., Huang, J., Wang, X., Huang, G., Ding, W., Chen, Y., Yang, J., Su, B. (2024): Exoskeleton rehabilitation robot training for balance and lower limb function in sub-acute stroke patients: a pilot, randomized controlled trial. – Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 21(1): 10p.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

EXOSKELETONS IN NEUROLOGICAL REHABILITATION: A COMMENTARY ON CURRENT EVIDENCE AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS. (2025). Quantum Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 4(3), 129-137. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjmhs.v4i3.147